The Markets.com alternatives reviewed in this guide are:
1. Bullwaves
2. Pepperstone
3. AvaTrade
4. XTB
5. IC Markets
6. Capital.com
7. OANDA
8. CMC Markets
9. Admirals
Each alternative offers a different combination of platforms, account structures, pricing and trading tools. The most relevant option depends on which parts of the existing workflow need to remain familiar and which features the trader wants to change.
The profiles below begin with Bullwaves and then examine the other platforms individually. After those profiles, the comparison tables and supporting sections provide the additional detail needed to compare the shortlist consistently.
Readers can use the individual profiles to understand each option first, then continue to the later tables and practical sections for a more detailed comparison of the factors that matter to their own situation.
Markets.com is often considered for its proprietary web and mobile experience, with platform availability changing by region. Bullwaves is the more specialised option here because the trading environment is built around MT5.
Choose this direction when platform familiarity, Expert Advisor compatibility or an MT5-first routine matters more than keeping a broker-designed interface. The two experiences are not interchangeable. Bullwaves offers Classic, VIP and ECN routes, so the useful comparison is the total cost for your instruments, not the lowest spread printed beside an account name.
Where Bullwaves stands out
1. MT5 on web, desktop and mobile.
2. AI Insights, market news and social trading around the execution platform.
3. Three account routes for different pricing preferences.
4. A direct path from research to the client dashboard.
5. A more focused platform decision than the one presented by Markets.com.
What to check before switching
1.
2. Equitex Capital Limited is regulated by the Seychelles FSA under licence SD185; Bullwaves is not an EU-regulated broker.
3. Eligibility, products and payment methods depend on country.
4. The Bullwaves workflow should be tested against the feature you use most at Markets.com.
Next step: Compare its spreads live in the client dashboard. Open a Bullwaves account
Bullwaves brings the main parts of the trading journey into one MT5-centred environment. Traders can use MetaTrader 5 on desktop, web and mobile, build watchlists, analyse charts, place market and pending orders, set protective levels and review account history from the same core platform.
The account experience is supported by AI Insights, market information and Social Trading. Together, these tools can help users organise research, follow market developments and study how other strategies are structured while keeping position size, margin use and risk decisions under their own control.
Before moving from research to live trading, users can compare the available account route, current spreads and commissions, instrument specifications and funding methods shown for their region. A practical first step is to recreate a normal watchlist in a demo account, test the orders used most often and confirm how the platform behaves across the devices that will form part of the everyday workflow.
Compared with Markets.com, Pepperstone is a credible alternative for traders who want a broad platform choice and a clearly separated raw-pricing route. Its official material describes MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and TradingView, with regional differences and standard and Razor pricing models.
Where it changes the decision
Its broader platform menu is the main reason to shortlist it. A trader can compare MetaTrader, cTrader and TradingView routes instead of committing to one interface.
What could make it a poor switch
That choice also creates more variables. Match the platform, Standard or Razor pricing route, and legal entity before comparing its costs with Markets.com.
Review the Pepperstone pricing and Pepperstone regulation before deciding.com.
Compared with Markets.com, AvaTrade is a credible alternative for traders who value a proprietary app alongside MetaTrader and broad educational support. Its official material describes AvaTradeGO, WebTrader, MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, with regional availability and retail and professional routes, plus product-specific and regional variants.
Where it changes the decision
AvaTrade is the app-led option in this group. It can appeal when a proprietary mobile and web experience matters as much as access to MetaTrader.
What could make it a poor switch
Tools and protections vary by country and entity. Check that the feature drawing you away from Markets.com is available for the account you can actually open.
Review the AvaTrade regulation comparison and AvaTrade platforms before deciding.com.
Compared with Markets.com, XTB is a credible alternative for traders who prefer a proprietary investing and CFD platform with integrated research. Its official material describes XTB's proprietary web and mobile platform; its official help centre says MT4 and MT5 are not currently offered and a Standard account structure on the international site.
Where it changes the decision
XTB represents the clearest move towards a proprietary investing and CFD interface. Its research and order workflow are designed around its own web and mobile platform.
What could make it a poor switch
This is a bigger platform change than it first appears. If you use MetaTrader at Markets.com, confirm that losing that workflow is acceptable and check which cash investments and CFDs exist locally.
Review the XTB account types and XTB group regulation before deciding.com.
Compared with Markets.com, IC Markets is a credible alternative for active or automated traders who prioritise raw pricing and platform choice. Its official material describes MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader and TradingView on parts of the group offering and standard and Raw Spread pricing structures.
Where it changes the decision
IC Markets is most relevant to active and automated traders comparing raw-pricing routes and a wider selection of third-party platforms.
What could make it a poor switch
Published global conditions are not universal. Compare commission, typical spread and server setup for the exact entity rather than using one headline number against Markets.com.
Review the IC Markets platforms and IC Markets regulation before deciding.com.
Compared with Markets.com, Capital.com is a credible alternative for traders who prefer an intuitive proprietary platform and integrated education. Its official material describes Capital.com's proprietary web/mobile platform and MetaTrader options under relevant entities and a proprietary-platform CFD account structure, with regional product differences.
Where it changes the decision
Capital.com is the usability-led alternative. Its proprietary platform and educational material can suit someone who wants a guided web and mobile experience.
What could make it a poor switch
Platform and product availability changes by entity. Verify whether the account offered in your country delivers the feature that Markets.com does not.
Review the Capital.com client-funds protection and Capital.com fraud and regulation information before deciding.com.
Best for: a long-established route with proprietary and MetaTrader workflows.
OANDA is worth comparing when transparent regional terms and a choice between a proprietary interface and MetaTrader matter. Platform, product and pricing availability differs by legal entity, so the useful comparison is the exact account offered in your country.
Check the current platform, instruments, fees and legal entity for your country before opening an account.
Markets.com can suit traders who want proprietary research tools alongside MetaTrader access. However, another broker may fit better if you want a different platform, pricing structure, regulatory entity or research workflow.
CMC Markets provides proprietary charting, research and order controls for traders who want an integrated broker-designed workflow.
This option is particularly relevant for traders looking for a feature-rich proprietary trading platform. Platform access, pricing and account availability should be compared for the country in which the account will be opened.
Admirals combines MetaTrader access with a wider investing and trading environment, subject to the products and account terms available through the relevant entity.
This option is particularly relevant for traders looking for MetaTrader access in a broader multi-asset setting. Platform access, pricing and account availability should be compared for the country in which the account will be opened.
We selected these Markets.com alternatives by comparing the parts of the Markets.com experience that most often drive a genuine switch:
1. Platform and device access.
2. Account structure and total trading costs.
3. Suitability for manual, automated or proprietary-platform workflows.
4. Public information about the legal entity and regional availability.
5. Funding, withdrawal and account-management practicalities.
6. The specific feature each option can replace without creating a larger workflow problem.
Each broker had to solve a distinct use case and provide enough official product or legal information for that fit to be checked. The order reflects the purpose stated in this guide, not a universal ranking for every trader or country.
The official Markets.com material presents markets.com web/mobile platform, MetaTrader and TradingView options by region and classic and MetaTrader-linked variants, with professional routes where eligible. That can be a good fit, but traders may still compare alternatives because they need a different platform, an MT5-only workflow, local regulatory access, another payment method or a simpler account structure.
Entity, platform and account information differs between European and global sites. Before switching, record the features you actually use. A longer feature list does not compensate for a missing instrument, unsuitable entity or unfamiliar order workflow.
Write down the three functions you use every week at Markets.com. If an alternative cannot reproduce the most important one, a lower advertised spread will not rescue the switch.
Compare spread, commission, overnight financing and conversion costs on the same instruments and typical holding periods. A demo can test workflow, but it cannot reproduce every live cost.
Markets.com documents a web and mobile experience alongside MetaTrader routes in its platform help centre. If the issue is the proprietary interface, moving to XTB, AvaTrade or Capital.com changes the design but keeps a broker-built workflow. If the aim is to standardise on MT5, Bullwaves is the more focused move, while Pepperstone and IC Markets preserve a broader platform menu.
Markets.com places news, analysis and charting around its own platform. During a demo test, start from the same market idea and measure how many steps it takes to verify the instrument, open the ticket, set protection and find the completed trade later. This is more revealing than comparing research-tool names in a table.
Bullwaves connects MT5 with AI Insights and social tools. Capital.com and XTB take different proprietary approaches. Pepperstone and IC Markets give more responsibility to the chosen third-party platform. The best fit depends on whether you want the broker or the terminal to organise the workflow.
Markets.com explains that its web platform can express size in units, while MetaTrader uses lots. A migration can therefore alter the way exposure is entered even before pricing changes. Rebuild one familiar position and verify contract size, minimum volume, margin and stop distance.
If automation is the reason for leaving the proprietary platform, test it as a new deployment. MT4 and MT5 Expert Advisors are not interchangeable, and another MT5 server can still use different symbols or permissions.
Some alternatives combine CFDs with cash investments under certain entities, while others are focused on leveraged trading. Decide whether the markets.com account is being replaced by one provider or whether trading and investing should remain in separate ledgers. Product ownership, financing and tax treatment should not be blurred because both products appear in one app.
Export one month of markets.com activity and mark the feature behind every trade: proprietary research, MetaTrader automation, mobile execution or a specific instrument. The alternative should improve the features responsible for most real activity. If it only wins on functions you rarely use, the switch is probably cosmetic.
The web platform combines price charts with news, technical material and sentiment or fundamental tools. Make a list of the research modules that actually lead to decisions. Then ask how each alternative replaces that step.
Bullwaves uses AI Insights and market content around MT5. XTB and Capital.com place more research inside proprietary experiences. AvaTrade combines its own apps with external platforms. Pepperstone and IC Markets may give the chosen platform a larger role. None is automatically better; the useful question is whether the information can be checked and turned into an order without unnecessary switching.
For one week, mark every tool opened and whether it changed the trade plan. A module that looks impressive but never affects entry, sizing or risk should carry little weight. A simple calendar or alert used daily may be far more valuable.
Open platforms are designed to make the current position visible, but migration decisions also depend on what can be reconstructed later. Check how each alternative records commission, swaps, conversion, partial closes and order modifications. Export the history and confirm that it can be matched to your own journal.
This matters particularly when moving between units and lots or from a proprietary platform to MetaTrader. A familiar monetary amount on the ticket can represent a different contract calculation beneath it.
First, a trader may want MT5 automation through Bullwaves while keeping a separate investing account elsewhere. Second, a proprietary-platform user may prefer XTB or Capital.com for discretionary trading but use another provider for a missing instrument. Third, a platform-choice user may select Pepperstone or IC Markets and keep long-term holdings away from leveraged CFDs.
Splitting should solve a real product or workflow problem. It also adds logins, statements, security settings and payment routes. Give every account one written purpose and close redundant routes only after records and balances are reconciled.
The replacement passes when you can prepare, enter, manage, close and review one representative trade without guessing where costs or controls are hidden. It fails when a central market is absent, an expected tool belongs to another entity or the daily workflow requires fragile workarounds.
Choose Bullwaves when the move is really a decision to make MT5 the centre of the workflow. Choose Pepperstone when the freedom to select MetaTrader, cTrader or TradingView matters more than keeping one proprietary interface. Choose AvaTrade when a broker-built app and MetaTrader should remain available together.
Choose XTB when the preferred outcome is one proprietary investing and CFD environment without a MetaTrader dependency. Choose IC Markets when raw-style pricing, third-party platforms and automation lead the decision. Choose Capital.com when the desired change is another guided proprietary platform with education close to execution.
Each sentence describes a trade-off, not a single best option. Confirm the contracting company and available account after selecting the workflow. If onboarding changes the platform, product or entity behind the sentence, repeat the comparison with the account actually offered.
Compare the new statement with the original markets.com cost and workflow audit. Check whether order errors, time spent switching tools and funding friction improved alongside explicit charges. A successful migration should make the chosen job easier in practice, not merely look different in the first week.
We place Bullwaves first among these Markets.com alternatives for eligible traders who want an MT5-first ecosystem with AI Insights and social trading. The other options can be stronger for proprietary platforms, additional platform choice or a different regional entity.
Open the platform in demo mode where possible, then compare the account and legal entity you can actually access with your current Markets.com setup.
For a move away from Markets.com into an MT5-focused workflow with integrated AI and social-trading tools, we place Bullwaves first. Choose a different option if the feature you are replacing points to cTrader, TradingView execution, a proprietary platform or a particular regulated entity.
Usually not. You normally open and verify a separate account, manage or close existing positions independently, and withdraw funds under Markets.com's payment rules. Do not close leveraged positions without considering market conditions and costs.
No. Platform support differs. For example, XTB's official help centre says it does not currently offer MT4 or MT5, while Bullwaves centres its experience on MT5. Compare that difference directly with the platform you currently use at Markets.com.
Navigate the trading markets and discover a world of opportunities.
Bullwaves.global website is owned by Moonance LLC, a company incorporated in St. Vincent & the Grenadines with registration no. 2141 LLC 2022 And registered address at First Floor, First St Vincent Bank Ltd Building, James Street, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
Moonance LLC is authorized and regulated by MISA with License Number T2022122
ETX Services Limited with company registration number HE455407, a company registered in Cyprus with registered address Archiepiskopou Makariou lll 160, 3026 Limassol is appointed as Independent Representative and Distributor.
Risk Disclaimer:
Over-the-counter derivatives are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing your initial capital rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how over-the-counter derivatives work and whether you can afford to take the high level of risk to your capital. Investing in over-the-counter derivatives carries significant risks and is not suitable for all investors.
When acquiring our derivative products you have no entitlement, right or obligation to the underlying financial asset. Moonance LLC is not a financial advisor and all services are provided on an execution only basis. Information is of a general nature only and does not consider your financial objectives, needs or personal circumstances. Important legal documents in relation to our products and services are available on our website. You should read and understand these documents before applying for any Bullwaves products or services and obtain independent professional advice as necessary.
Regional Restrictions:
The information or services described on this website is not directed at or offered to residents of Belgium, Maldives, North Korea, United States, Afghanistan, Central African Republic, China, Cuba, Libya, Nicaragua, Palestinian Authority/Gaza/West Bank, Venezuela and to jurisdictions on the FATF and EU/UN sanctions lists or any other person in any jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local laws or regulations. For more information please contact our support. Clients who onboarded via www.bullwaves.com can contact our support team at support@bullwaves.com.For complaints please email us at compliance@bullwaves.com
Contact us by phone: +44 7488 822576
Risk Warning: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Investors should consider whether they understand how CFDs work before investing.